16.2.16

educación y desproductivismo: una conversación

con Nuccio Ordine
a partir de su manifiesto: "La utilidad de lo inútil"
el miércoles 17 de febrero a las 19h


http://ajuntament.barcelona.cat/lavirreina/ca/activitats/valor


9.2.16

no es país para niñxs

http://noespaisparaninxs.tumblr.com/



5.2.16

Software as a Critique

What: Software as a Critique (Discussion)
Where: LAG
1e, Schinkelstraat 14-16, 1075 TX Amsterdam
When: Sunday 14 February 14:00-18:00

A discussion introduced by software cases like Pattern for Python, Faircoin Wallet, MakeHuman, The Unicode Standards.

With: Kym Ward, Aymeric Mansoux, Jara Rocha, Roel Roscam Abbing, Femke Snelting, Dick Reckard.


Due to the importance and ubiquity of software in our lives, it is urgent to recognise and deal with the political and social elements that are translated into the technical domain and vice versa. Looking from the technical side, code often replicates existing
social constructions, reinforcing existing hegemonies or mirroring cultural patterns of inclusion and exclusion. Conversely, technological elements have their own political agency, beyond conventional parliamentary politics, aiming for example towards efficiency, quantification, transparency.

In this afternoon meeting, we will start by looking at the interactions between technical and non-technical aspects of specific pieces of software that raise political or ethical issues. We’ll be looking at questions like: What happens when you translate a body into a 3D mesh? What variety of people are involved in crypto-currencies, and how do their different political views transfer into decentralised banking systems? Who decides how we get to choose our gender from drop-down menus, and who benefits from a multiplicity of options? What is at stake in the challenge of a machine that writes poetry?

After considering how such questions translate in potential and existing software practices, we’d like to discuss whether they could inform a kind of critique that is not confined to the spaces of artistic or academic discourse. Can these approaches and methodologies create a space of critique inside software-centered communities that is not segregated from its productive practices?

Please find more information following the link below:


http://www.constantvzw.org/site/Software-as-a-Critique.html