4th of August, 2014
Thinking together / Osthang Project
Darmstadt, Germany
"How can we live together? This is the very simple and fun (if not challenging) question that the participants of the Osthang Architecture Summer School will be asking this Summer in Darmstadt, Germany. The program will come to a closure with a nine day(!) public forum titled “thinking together” curated by Berno Odo Polzer. As Berno writes:
“«Thinking Together» is focused on rethinking future modes of living together in a pluricentric world, so it is a transdisciplinary platform for political imagination: ‘political’ because it is concerned with the way in which we organize the spaces, practices and lives that we share, locally as well as globally – ‘imagination’ because it is aimed at forming new ideas and imaginaries about how to do so.”
Be it in
getting out the call for the next demonstration on some “cloud
service”, or developing a progressive tech project in the name of an
imagined user community, scarcity of resources and distribution of
expertise makes short cuts inevitable. But do they really?
The
current distance between those who organise their activism to develop
“technical infrastructures” and those who bring their struggles to these
infrastructures is remarkable. The paradoxical consequences can be
baffling: (radical) activists organize and sustain themselves using
“free” technical services provided by Fortune 500 companies. At the same
time, “alternative tech practices”, like the Free Software Community,
are sustained by a select (visionary and male) few, proposing crypto
with 9-lives as the minimum infrastructure for any political
undertaking.
The
naturalization of this division of labor may be recognized in statements
about activists having better things to do than to tinker with code or
hardware, or in technological projects that locate their politics solely
in the technology and infrastructures as if they are outside of the
social and political domain. What may seem like a pragmatic solution
actually re-iterates faultlines of race, gender, age and class. Through
the convenient delegation of “tech matters” to the techies or to
commercial services, collectives may experience a shift in the
collective’s priorities and a reframing of their activist culture
through technological decisions. The latter, however, are typically not
open to a broader political discussion and contestation. Such separation
also gets in the way of actively considering the way in which changes
in our political realities are entangled with shifts in technological
infrastructures.
We want
to use this day to resist the reflex of “first getting things done” in
order to start a long term collaboration that intersects those of us
with a background in politics of society and politics of technology." (Seda Gürses)
Together with Seda Gürses, Femke Snelting & Miriyam Aouragh
+ info on Thinking together here
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario